Anti-Architecture in a time of a futureless mindset.
I sit down and begin writing about this subject in what could turn out to be a futile effort.
My belief:
In order to create a piece of architecture, there first must be many people who believe that there will be a tomorrow. The process of creating an architectural structure alone could take months, years, or generations to complete. If people believed there were no tomorrow, civilization, as we know it, would collapse into a chaotic free flowing anarchy. People would no longer think ahead about food, money, art, shelter, etc. Any creation would be temporary, primal, and utilitarian in nature. Would these shelters be considered architecture? Conjuring a mental image of some of the great pieces of architecture project an aura of permanence and immense accomplishment, where countless people have experienced something emotionally moving while inhabiting or viewing the piece. One does not imagine a wood hut that has a simple door cut from its twisting branch façade, a fallen tree used as a bridge, or a life sustaining water well. Architecture implies a physical interaction with a material to make it more suited for a composite structure.
Temporality:
Do a person’s actions determine their belief in the future? There could be extreme cases where cult suicide or paranoia takes hold, but what about energy uses. Most people in the
Architects are not innocent. Architecture, like everything else, has become a business that must make money or it will die, so our work is done as rapidly and cost effective as possible – meaning that the quality of work suffers greatly. This copy of a copy of a copy has become the industry standard, with few speaking out against the unbreakable mold.
Anti-architecture is an idea full of pain and fear, but also with a hope of change.
No comments:
Post a Comment